AI governance in 2026 is shaped by closer attention to legal risk, operational controls and accountability. The core issue is not the technology itself, but how existing legal duties apply …
UK Information Commissioner 2024/25 report signals weaker enforcement David Erdos’s analysis of the UK Information Commissioner’s Annual Report 2024/25 identifies a systematic trend away from adequate enforcement. The legal significance …
UK artificial intelligence regulation remains in a developing phase, with policy attention centred on how existing legal frameworks apply to AI systems. The February 2026 outlook indicates that AI continues …
AI-assisted writing is attracting attention because one academic recently acknowledged using AI in some of his written work, prompting criticism from an AI researcher. The legal issue is not the …
Claims that the US Supreme Court has ruled AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted are incorrect. The issue concerns copyrightability of works created with AI, but no such Supreme Court declaration …
AI copyright arguments in C-250/25 Like Company v Google are shifting away from a strict input-output divide. The hearing raised a focused question on whether the legal analysis should stop …
AI-assisted writing is drawing scrutiny because writers are openly acknowledging that they have used artificial intelligence in their work. The immediate issue is not the technology itself, but the legal …
Claims that the US Supreme Court has decided AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted are incorrect. The issue described is not a Supreme Court ruling on copyrightability, but a misleading headline …
Like Company v Google has taken an unexpected turn on the relationship between AI training inputs and generated outputs in copyright law. The hearing before the CJEU in case C-250/25 …
AI-assisted writing raises questions of attribution and professional integrity Recent discussions have focused on the use of artificial intelligence in writing, following an admission by a US-based academic that AI …
